I recently evaluated a couple of these new app servers (for Scala) and i found Play! to be the slowest (in terms of scalability/concurrency)...considerably so. In fact i think Play! was slower than WebObjects...[though i can't remember for sure]
IMO the primary motivation customers have for moving off WebObjects is its inability to perform in an increasingly multi-core processor world. If i were looking at something other than WO i would choose a platform that is more concurrent not less. i.e for me there wouldn't be any point in choosing Play! over WO... On 11/03/2011, at 3:23 AM, Pascal Robert <[email protected]> wrote: > I saw a demo of the Play! Framework (http://www.playframework.org) at a > conference today, and I must say that it's the first time that I saw > something that I really want to try out. It seems like a good mix between > Ruby on Rails and WO, so I was wondering if someone else here have tried out > that framework? _______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list ([email protected]) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to [email protected]
