On 11/03/2011, at 2:37 PM, Joe Little wrote: > Well, I grok groovy more than scala, but that isn't saying much. I > just see Grails as getting everything right about Java (for the most > part)
nothing wrong with groovy or Grails. For a statically typed, OO & functional lang I'm liking scala. But whatever gets the job done and keeps things interesting... :) > and picking what was right about Rails. Liftweb seems to make my > brain hurt, admittedly the docs for lift have (for an intro) too much info... it needs some more quickstart guides. But it is a very cool and powerful framework. The templates are very nicely done: there's no logic in the display code, etc. Very active community. > and Play is a minimal Grails without half the traction to > getting things done. Seems like a nice framework, sure. with regards, - Lachlan Deck _______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list ([email protected]) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to [email protected]
