Not always. ‘Have another drink..its good for you’ was such a lie.
Karl On Jul 5, 2011, at 9:00 PM, Travis Britt wrote: > Everything Chuck says is true. > > tb > > On Jul 5, 2011, at 1:44 PM, Chuck Hill wrote: >> On Jul 5, 2011, at 1:35 PM, Ramsey Gurley <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> I was there Hugi and I think I missed something (^_^) >>> >>> I though the discussion was about forking Wonder, which seemed a little odd >>> to me considering we have github nowadays. Anyone can fork it and if you >>> attract a following, so be it. >>> >>> If we are discussing a WO fork... I wonder, has anyone ever actually asked >>> Apple if they are willing to open source the WO 5.4.3 release? >> >> Yes. They will not. >> >> >>> The Java people made enough noise to get Apple's JDK source released to >>> Oracle for OpenJDK. We aren't as large as they are, but I would argue that >>> we are more important to Apple's operations. >> >> I doubt that. >> >> >>> Certainly Apple would see a lot of value in having a healthy community of >>> WO devs to pluck. >> >> I think we have pretty much been fully plucked. >> >> >>> Legal issues aside, it would be much easier to simply get Apple's blessing. >>> They have gobs of money. It isn't like they can't afford to throw us a >>> bone. There should at least be a petition to ask them formally if that >>> hasn't already been done. >> >> Wasting your time, IMO. > > _______________________________________________ > Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. > Webobjects-dev mailing list ([email protected]) > Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: > http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/kgretton%40mac.com > > This email sent to [email protected] _______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list ([email protected]) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to [email protected]
