On Jul 18, 2012, at 9:36 AM, Pascal Robert wrote: > > Le 2012-07-18 à 09:22, G Brown a écrit : > >> Do you mean: >> >> 1. A User Manual for all wocommunity, and >> >> 2. A Developer Manual for wocommunity? > > No, I mean one wiki space for people who contribute to Wonder and WOLips (and > other related tools), and another space with everything else (e.g. 95% of the > content of the current wiki). >
That is what I meant by User and Developer. > So maybe "Documentation", and "Community" would be better names. [WOCommunity]UserDocumentation - for tool, framework, use documentation--how to use the stuff, [WOCommunity]Tool&FrameworkDevelopment - for how to develop the tools, and frameworks Prepending "WOCommunity" to wiki names would be a little redundant on the WOCommunity website; however, a little redundancy is not always bad for human brains. These wiki names would indicate what kinds of thing were contained in the wiki, hopefully clearly as well. Oui/Non? > >> Maybe UserManual would be a better name than Wonder? I would think the >> Wonder wiki would cover just Wonder, not WOLips, etc. Historically it >> certainly has been true. >> >> Names are important. The name should reflect what it is. >> >> $0.02 >> >> >> On Jul 17, 2012, at 10:20 PM, Pascal Robert wrote: >> >>> >>> We do want to have only two spaces: one for "regular" users one for >>> contributors. Check the docs mailing list discussions: >>> >>> https://wocommunity.org:9100/Lists/docs-group/List.html >>> >>> The big, non contributor space, is Wonder, and we wanted to move all >>> current stuff from the WO space to Wonder. >>> >>> >> >> >> G Brown >> [email protected] >> >> >> >> > G Brown [email protected]
_______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list ([email protected]) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to [email protected]
