I still use the regular distribution… On Feb 5, 2015, at 4:57 PM, Pascal Robert <[email protected]> wrote:
> And no leadership. Also, at WOWODC 2014, almost everyone said that they are > using their own forks. > > De: "Chuck Hill" <[email protected]> > À: "Ken Anderson" <[email protected]>, "Pascal Robert" <[email protected]> > Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > Envoyé: Jeudi 5 Février 2015 16:42:00 > Objet: Re: [OT] .Net goes Open Source > > I think he means there have not been a lot of new additions or work done on > it lately. > > > > On 2015-02-05, 1:13 PM, "Ken Anderson" wrote: > > Nobody cares about WOnder anymore? You feeling OK Pascal? > > On Feb 5, 2015, at 4:11 PM, Pascal Robert <[email protected]> wrote: > > I guess it will be in the not-very-open TreasureBoard. Nobody cares about > Wonder anymore. > > ----- Mail original ----- > De: "Daniel D CIV NAVAIR Beatty, 474300D" <[email protected]> > À: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > Envoyé: Jeudi 5 Février 2015 16:07:11 > Objet: RE: [OT] .Net goes Open Source > > Hi gang, > I seem to remember talk amongst the project wonder gang that we might > actually refactor Wonder to use a pseudo-web-objects. If looks like WO, > smells like WO, but legally not WO could Wonder be the owner? > > V/R, > > Daniel Beatty, Ph.D., > IEEE Certified Software Development Professional (CSDP) > Computer Scientist > Code 474300D > 1 Administration Circle. M/S 1109 > China Lake, CA 93555 > [email protected] > (760)939-7097 > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] On > Behalf Of Troy Lumasag > Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2015 10:15 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [OT] .Net goes Open Source > > Hey guys, > > What really are the problems - direct, impending or long term problems being > as it is now? > I can recall these stated problems if I understood it correct: > 1. porting issues(moving to future java versions) 2. single-threaded editing > context <- Must be a bottleneck problem for multiple instance setup? > > Sorry if I'm being naive on my question haha > > --Troy > > On 2/5/2015 11:55 AM, Timothy Worman wrote: > WebObjects is one of Apple’s weapons - it helps them be fluid and quick - > especially with the devs they have. Maybe open sourcing WO seems threatening > because it is a internal business advantage. > > Tim Worman > UCLA GSE&IS > > On Feb 4, 2015, at 4:59 PM, OC <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 5. 2. 2015, at 1:42, Hugi Thordarson <[email protected]> wrote: > Apple cares about money, not us. > Oh, absolutely! Given the zilliards Apple charges for WebObjects licences... > oh, wait. > > Actually I just don't get it -- for long long years I don't get it at all. > > (i) first, they seriously cripple the world's best web application framework > by cutting out the ObjC support, leaving it Java-only, and thus half-unusable. > > (ii) then they stop bundling it. > > (iii) then they stop supporting it at all. > > All right, I can see after (i) they could hardly charge any money for > licencing, whilst the support price would skyrocket; but why on earth not put > it to open source at the same moment?!? > > The same company who is known to put _lots_ of pretty interesting things to > public (see Darwin). > > Oh, sigh. > > About the only (dumb and conspirational) theory I can think of is > that were the sources open, hacking App Store would get the usual > 'varsity freaks pastime :) > > - hugi > > > > http://blogs.msdn.com/b/dotnet/archive/2015/02/03/coreclr-is-now-op > en-source.aspx > > The github is here > > https://github.com/dotnet/coreclr > > It’s a shame Apple never did the same with WO. > > _______________________________________________ > Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. > Webobjects-dev mailing list ([email protected]) > Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: > https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/ocs%40ocs.cz > > This email sent to [email protected] > > _______________________________________________ > Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. > Webobjects-dev mailing list ([email protected]) > Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: > https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/lists%40thetim > my.com > > This email sent to [email protected] > > _______________________________________________ > Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. > Webobjects-dev mailing list ([email protected]) > Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: > https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/tlumasag%40gmai > l.com > > This email sent to [email protected] > > _______________________________________________ > Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. > Webobjects-dev mailing list ([email protected]) > Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: > https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/daniel.beatty%40navy.mil > > This email sent to [email protected] > > _______________________________________________ > Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. > Webobjects-dev mailing list ([email protected]) > Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: > https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/probert%40macti.ca > > This email sent to [email protected] > > _______________________________________________ > Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. > Webobjects-dev mailing list ([email protected]) > Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: > https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/kenlists%40anderhome.com > > This email sent to [email protected] > >
_______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list ([email protected]) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to [email protected]
