Richard Lowe wrote: > "S h i v " <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > >>Hi, >> >>I came across bugs in bugs database that are already discussed for >>sponsoring of correction over a year back! >> >>Ex: Correction for SUNWonbld errors have been proposed in >>http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/request-sponsor/2006-April/002107.html >> >>But the bugs db has a few of them in Dispatched status even now (as of >>6-Aug-2007 as per the timestamp on oss-bite-size bugs webpage) >> >>Is the data on the webpage and more importantly do the status of the >>bugs in the bugs db reflect the latest status? >> > > > Mostly, yes. b.o.o seems to sync around every 24 hours. > However, I've seen several (in the 10's of) bugs that have failed to > sync, and it appears that once a bug doesn't sync, it will not sync > until it's next changed. > > In other words, if the sync misses a change, it can be considerably out of > date. > > I don't know the specifics of the status of any of Rainer's changes, > but I would assume the bug database to be accurate, and these to be > waiting on part of the process.
I asked the boo folks to go through the logs and they said there was a service interruption on 8/11 that caused the nightly update to fail. They did manual refresh, so let me know if that fixes the issue you are seeing. If not, send me a list of some of the bugs that are not synced up and I will investigate further. We are also trying to find a way to set a periodic refresh of all the bugs. Derek > > -- Rich > _______________________________________________ > website-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > -- Derek Cicero Program Manager Solaris Kernel Group, Software Division _______________________________________________ website-discuss mailing list [email protected]
