On Jul 11, 2008, at 01:07, Stephen Lau wrote: > Simon Phipps wrote: >> >> On Jul 11, 2008, at 00:48, Stephen Lau wrote: >> >>> Simon Phipps wrote: >>>> >>>> I'd like to request that the OpenStorage box link to the >>>> community not the Sun product page. I'd also like to request a >>>> review of the process that got them there. >>> Disagree. I think they should be taken down first, and then the >>> process to put them in should be initiated. >> >> While I sympathise with and share the frustration I think that is >> too bureaucratic and extreme. Since both are acceptable topics that >> we will be able to agree should be there, I suggest we fix the bugs >> in them and then ask the OGB to liaise with Sun for an explanation >> of why they appeared from nowhere. We need to make sure that future >> postings happen transparently, so that errors like using the wrong >> link can be corrected before rather than after they are made. >> > Who decides they are "acceptable"?
In the previous posting you made, you did. I was reflecting that. > > The Website Community Group does. You and I don't get to decide > whether they are acceptable or not. > Until the Website CG reviews them, they don't get to be there. A good solution if all that matters is process, a bad one for seeking a compromise that helps people co-operate. I'd suggest we consider this discussion to be that review. S. _______________________________________________ website-discuss mailing list [email protected]
