James Carlson wrote:
No, that should be "open" exposure. When a case is "open," it's
supposed to be white-listed. It's all open material, and people
commenting on it are duty-bound to avoid doing non-open things.
"Manual" exposure requires changes to the materials in order to open
things, which requires more work.
For 'manual' cases files need explicit tagging with a '.opensolaris.
suffix. And as you yourself have pointed out, this hasn't been done
properly. There are cases flagged as 'manual' with no '.opensolaris'
suffixes, which clearly shows that the 'manual' designation has been
sometimes been used improperly.
I had at one time believed that the process of marking a case open
(which does involve additional human review of the materials, btw),
implicitly performed this "whitelisting" step.
No, it doesn't.
It's supposed to. That's why the older checks for 'Sun Proprietary'
notices were so stringent -- we only wanted to make sure that clear
and blatant errors were flagged, not every passing reference to the
concept of proprietary data.
I think John Plocher tried to point that out earlier.
I've repeatedly pointed out that the script is *not* just looking for
the word 'proprietary'. Please look at the redacted case list on
jurassic - the majority of cases have been redacted because they contain
the phrases "Sun Proprietary" or "Sun Confidential".
--
Alan Burlison
--
_______________________________________________
website-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
