Garrett D'Amore wrote:
So, instead of finding the outliers that need to be fixed, and fixing those manually, you're applying a draconian process whereby *all* materials for a case will be redacted if any of the "evil" words or phrases appear anywhere?
The assumption is that if we find a problem in one file it is likely that other problems may also exist and that the case needs re-examining.
This is uncool. As I said, *every* case I've touched in the past couple of years was fully redacted because of errors either in your script, or nits in .ms files or errors made by the ARC coordinator in flagging the minutes "ENGINEERING ONLY".
Those tags should be removed from the cases. If you haven't been doing that, you need to do so.
Btw, I believe "ENGINEERING ONLY" carries no legal value. It doesn't indicate that the material is confidential, and is instead used to indicate that ARC meetings (all PSARC meetings) are generally only open to engineering. (Historically, Marketing folks and such were not invited to PSARC, only to prevent discussions at PSARC from drifting away from engineering content and into issues that properly belong with the business teams.)
That would need confirmation from Sun Legal. Until then, we will be erring on the side of caution.
-- Alan Burlison -- _______________________________________________ website-discuss mailing list [email protected]
