On May 27, 2009, at 19:20, Elaine Ashton wrote:
Perhaps the OGB should consider appointing an archivist, preferrably someone with some interest and experience in archiving to help shape the policy.
I've not seen anything so far to persuade me that the OGB ought to intervene. Archiving historical work should be a routine part of the work of the Website Community Group, and un-doing the un-used (a different job to archiving what is no longer current) sounds non- controversial.
Is there a reason this is being referred to the OGB rather than just handled where it belongs in the Website CG?
Thanks S. _______________________________________________ website-discuss mailing list [email protected]
