On Aug 11, 2009, at 9:12 PM, Valerie Bubb Fenwick wrote:
Yes, I am very aware of google and its wonders, but this all seems
to be
coming from an assumption that we've all been very bad at
maintaining links
and therefor there is no reason to maintain them in the migration.
yes,
there are broken links, but why force them all to be broken?
Sorry, I was just pointing out how many, if not most, folks likely
manage to find content on the site, even the stuff with non-broken
links. I tend to stay out of messy battles like this one is sure to
be, but I will point out that remapping every URL from the current
site to the new urls is not very realistic.
e.
_______________________________________________
website-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
