Fellow contributors,

I'm requesting a detailed specification for how case materials are redacted on the ARC caselog site. The information that appears at http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/arc/arc-faq/arc-publish-historical-checklist/ refers to publishing /historical/ cases, and, while some of the rule specifications that exist there presumably are being applied to NON historical cases, is clearly not a complete description of the applied rules. Additionally, the discussion that occurred in March of '09 (http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/arc-discuss/2009-March/000819.html) does not contain enough information to prevent automatic case redaction from occurring where it really shouldn't. This information should include both redaction and simple file ignoring.

Thanks,
Mark

_______________________________________________
website-discuss mailing list
[email protected]

Reply via email to