Mark Martin wrote:

I'm requesting a detailed specification for how case materials are redacted on the ARC caselog site. The information that appears at http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/arc/arc-faq/arc-publish-historical-checklist/ refers to publishing /historical/ cases, and, while some of the rule specifications that exist there presumably are being applied to NON historical cases, is clearly not a complete description of the applied rules. Additionally, the discussion that occurred in March of '09 (http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/arc-discuss/2009-March/000819.html) does not contain enough information to prevent automatic case redaction from occurring where it really shouldn't. This information should include both redaction and simple file ignoring.

I've already addressed this question on arc-discuss, and explained why we can't discuss the exact details.

http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/arc-discuss/2009-September/000967.html

--
Alan Burlison
--
_______________________________________________
website-discuss mailing list
[email protected]

Reply via email to