Hi Andreas, Andreas Mantke wrote on 2010-10-09 22.05:
sorry that I jump so late in. But in my opinion it is very important that we have asap a wiki. We should go with the wiki that the most project members are used to. I think this wiki engine will also make the fewest problems to import content from the current OOo-Wiki.
I agree, and that's why I would like to stick with MediaWiki, especially as the basic setup is already running.
If the LO-Wiki is not available by Monday the work inside the documentfoundation / LO will get not the necessary structure. We need it i.e. to write down tasks, so that volunteers can catch them.
The problem is: My day has only 24 hours. Now that we have the demand of a separated l10n search and namespace structure, I need to invest more time, but I definitely cannot do that by Monday.
The current wiki can be opened up in a few seconds, but if we need to fulfill the raised requirements, Monday is not possible from my side.
Florian -- Florian Effenberger <flo...@documentfoundation.org> Steering Committee and Founding Member of The Document Foundation Tel: +49 8341 99660880 Fax: +49 8341 99660889 Mobile: +49 151 14424108 Skype: floeff | Twitter/Identi.ca: @floeff -- To unsubscribe, e-mail to website+h...@libreoffice.org List archives are available at http://www.libreoffice.org/lists/website/ All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted.
