Hello Andreas,
I think Philipp has a point here. Mozilla came up with some very good
designs and I think that one of the utmost priorities with the new
extensions and templates site is to attract and appeal to users.
Best,
Charles.
Le 2014-02-12 12:05, Philipp Weissenbacher a écrit :
Hey Andreas,
Indeed, it does sound more user-friendly like that. I think that most
people/extension developers would approach publishing an extension like
that.
I don't want to ruin your enthusiasm, but how about we adapt what
Mozilla
has?
Source: https://github.com/mozilla/zamboni or better
https://github.com/mozilla/playdoh
IMHO they already have a lot of features we'd also like, plus there's a
shared maintenance cost.
It's based on Django, however. So there'd be some learning curve to
overcome. + extra load on the servers.
Never mind the course we take, I'd be very much willing to help
implement
it.
Gruß,
Philipp
Op 11 feb. 2014 22:18 schreef "Andreas Mantke" <ma...@gmx.de>:
Hello,
after the feedback from Cor I thought of an alternative structure
(hierarchy) of the content types. It would be more flat.
-- ExtensionsCenter (EC)
-- ExtensionsProject (EP)
-- ExtensionsRelease (ER)
The EC will contain in the edit view form fields to customize the
total
center, e.g. to add LibreOffice versions, categories, licenses. The
view
will show a search form with result area, short search links etc.
The contributor will have to create (or get) an account and start with
a
project for each extension. There will be a edit form where he will be
asked for the necessary information about the extension project. The
view of the project will show information about the project, e.g.
category, description and maybe a form to send messages to the project
owner. There will also links to the releases and for the download of
the
files (for each public release).
The release content type will contain the information about the
release
and all extensions files of that release with the information about
license and appropriate platform. I had to add about 5 or 6 file
fields
to the release content type.
It would be possible to add some more information to each content
type,
e.g. install instructions, legal information for users, images
(screenshots, logos).
Does this structure sound more user friendly? Feedback? Additions?
Regards,
Andreas
--
## Developer LibreOffice
## Freie Office-Suite für Linux, Mac, Windows
## http://LibreOffice.org
## Support the Document Foundation (http://documentfoundation.org)
## Meine Seite: http://www.amantke.de
--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: website+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems?
http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more:
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/website/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be
deleted
--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: website+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/website/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
