We are targetting this RFE 6728729 as part of the MySQL 5.1 Integration and a changed draft of the ARC case will be sent shortly .
Jyri Virkki wrote: > > On Aug 7, 2008, at 12:39 AM, Sunanda Menon wrote: > >> The RFE is 6728729:MySQL should have libraries in separate >> >> I would like to take that up separately after this Integration is >> done as we have already filed the PKG RTI and ARC case etc > > The ARC case has not even started yet so you're very early on that > cycle, best time to make changes. > It is true there's some work to edit the draft, but that work is much > less than having to write a new case later > undoing what this one does. > > If the packageRTI has been approved already [aside: it shouldn't > really have been sent in before ARC case > because what if the ARC review changes something in the packaging?] > all it takes is one email to adjust your proposal so that's not much > of a burden. > >> ,so to go and do the rework at this stage won't be possible . > > Procedurally it is certainly possible since you're so early in the > approval cycles. > > If you just really prefer to do it separately later for other reasons, > that'd be your decision. > But don't jump to that decision based on procedural grounds, since > it's not too late (in fact, it's early). > > It'll be a lot more work for you later though, since you'll have to > handle the users upgrading from 5.1-pre-split to 5.1-post-split, work > which you can avoid entirely by delivering it that way initially. > > -- Sunanda Menon Database Technology Group BLR03, x87098/91-80-66937098
