On 03/06/09 14:14, rahul wrote: > | Thanks for reviewing : > | > | On Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at 12:20:12PM +0530, rahul wrote: > | > - sed module.conf says > | > +++ new/usr/src/cmd/apache2/modules/sed.conf Thu Mar 5 18:31:19 2009 > | * security2.conf, fcgid.conf all takes the same approach : > | * Since sed.conf is architechture independent, it has two choices: > | 1. LoadModule sed_module libexec/64/mod_sed.so > | or > | 2. LoadModule sed_module libexec/$ARCH/mod_sed.so > | > | In both cases, user have to edit this file. > | > | * There was a plan to create 64 symlink in apache2/libexec directory > (similar > | to webstack 1.4), but I don't know what is the resolution. > | > | We can file a separate Bug to correct all apache modules sample > configuration. > ok with me. > > The original incantation was > LoadModule jk_module libexec/::MACH64::/mod_jk.so > > and it was supposed to be processed by conf-install in the main > Makefile.sfw, since conf-install is not doing that, it also need to be > fixed as a separate bug. >
No, that is not required. See my response to Basan't mail. -- Seema.
