Sorry if I am boring someone with this. Given an average load (100 users) it is the apache-ssl process that's eating the 4 CPUs. Our next task is lightening the served pages, in hope that this will lighten the burden of encrypting the traffic. On the other side, I expect the webware process to be the next bottleneck :-)
El vie, 28-02-2003 a las 10:48, Marcos Sánchez Provencio escribió: > I'd laugh if I could. This is an application that was begun for a > mainframe maaany years ago and has been translated with the minimum > change (effort I would say) through different platforms since then. I > would dump the whole thing If I could. > > So, my next suggestion will be leaving that dinosaur alone and have a > Linux box by its side to deal with the app server and the apache-ssl > business. Or better, two. They will cost as much as the memory upgrade > that the Sun is going to need. > > Thank you again > -- > Marcos, trying to get some free software into the Spanish Public > Administration > > El vie, 28-02-2003 a las 00:02, Edmund Lian escribió: > > > > On 02/27/2003 04:36:02 PM Marcos Sánchez Provencio wrote: > > > > >I'll have to profile the whole app, but I think that the poor machine is > > >plainly overworked. I'll ask the local Oracle guru on Monday. Is it me > > >or Oracle _needs_ a guru by its side? Sybase and MSSQL weren't so picky. > > > > It definitely isn't you. Oracle is a pain in the ass to install/manage. > > It's a resource hog, and wants lots of memory, lots of semaphores, etc., > > etc. And it isn't self-tuning. Sybase and its cousing MS SQL are definitely > > on a different plane when it comes to these things. Have you looked at > > PostgreSQL? It's very Oracle-like in its architecture, but is a snap to > > install/manage. You have to get the memory buffer sizing, etc. correct too, > > like Oracle. > > > > ...Edmund. > > >
signature.asc
Description: Esta parte del mensaje esta firmada digitalmente
