Hallo,
Thomas E Jenkins hat gesagt: // Thomas E Jenkins wrote:

> On Mon, 2003-11-10 at 05:25, Frank Barknecht wrote:
> > Tried now, but it didn't help. I might have to live with this problem,
> > but then I would need a way to restart the AppServer with a "kill -9
> > allAppServerPIDs" beforehand automatically...
> 
> The only way I found to prevent these stale connections is to explicitly
> build a new one for every group of DB operations.  That of course throws
> away any connection pooling you can do.  You may also want to look at
> David Rushby's resilient DBPool and see if you can make more progress
> than I in implementing a MySQL version.  The message can be found here:
> http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=5761200

Well, I'm using SQLObject, so I'm dependent on SQLObject's pooling
(maybe this can be switched off, though, I didn't look). I'm really
considering to switch to Postgresql now, which is possible thanks to
the abstraction provided by SQLObject, but it still would be a major
step. I'm wondering, if this could help, or if I'd just take my
problems to another backend... ?!

ciao
-- 
 Frank Barknecht                               _ ______footils.org__


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email sponsored by: ApacheCon 2003,
16-19 November in Las Vegas. Learn firsthand the latest
developments in Apache, PHP, Perl, XML, Java, MySQL,
WebDAV, and more! http://www.apachecon.com/
_______________________________________________
Webware-discuss mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webware-discuss

Reply via email to