Hallo, Ian Bicking hat gesagt: // Ian Bicking wrote: > FWIW, my understanding is that MySQL connections are quick to make and > you don't gain much from pooling (at least if the server is on the same > host as the client). So it might not be so bad to avoid pooling > connections entirely. I know this isn't true for a lot of other > databases, and I don't know much time Postgres connections take, but > maybe other people have run their own experiments (e.g., running a > thousand simple queries, once with a single connection and another time > with new connections for each query).
Is this possible (easily) with SQLObject? I naively tried the keyword argument "pool=0" but that didn't work. ;) Or do I need to inherit my own connection? BTW: I found this in the MySQLdb patch repository: http://c0re.23.nu/c0de/misc/MySQL-python-0.9.2-cyclicref.patch I also tried it with mysqldb 0.9.2, but it didn't solve the problem. ciao -- Frank Barknecht _ ______footils.org__ ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by: ApacheCon 2003, 16-19 November in Las Vegas. Learn firsthand the latest developments in Apache, PHP, Perl, XML, Java, MySQL, WebDAV, and more! http://www.apachecon.com/ _______________________________________________ Webware-discuss mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webware-discuss
