Hallo, Jason Hildebrand hat gesagt: // Jason Hildebrand wrote: > I agree that it would be a great sample app, but I'd propose not to build > a general "portal solution" (at least not right away ;) -- but to build a > site customized to the needs of the Webware project. It should be simple > to start with, so that we actually get it up and running sometime soon. > We can add bells and whistles later.
I totally agree. This is something, that can grow over time. But a simple, DB-driven content manager should be fast to build. I mean, this is something, Webware is used for daily by us, so it's probably on everyone's harddisk anyway. (I only prefer SQLObject, not MiddleKit.) Regarding graphics: Generally I think, that most coders don't make good graphics people, that's why normally those are two different departments. Maybe someone here has some graphics wizard at hand who could put together a cool layout? (I don't care much about logos, a good layout is more important for a future WW website.) ciao -- Frank Barknecht _ ______footils.org__ ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click _______________________________________________ Webware-discuss mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webware-discuss
