Thanks, Gary. The typo was here, not in seasons.inc. But I had another 
assumption: When displaying the values $current.txBatteryStatus.raw and 
$current.wh65_battery.raw , I could see, that the first one was empty, and 
only the second value was existent. My assumption was, that  $
day.txBatteryStatus had data from time of this day before switching from 
interceptor to gw1000 driver, but $day.wh65_battery did not (yet). 
So I tried this modification:

#set $have_battery_status = 0
#for $x in [$day.txBatteryStatus, $day.wh65_battery, 
$day.windBatteryStatus, $day.rainBatteryStatus, $day.outTempBatteryStatus, 
$day.inTempBatteryStatus]
  #if $x.has_data
    #set $have_battery_status = 1
  #end if
#end for

If this was true, I expected, that the sensor section would be present 
today, because 

#if $have_battery_status
    <tr><th>Batterie Status</th><th></th></tr>
#if $day.txBatteryStatus.has_data
    <tr>
      <td class="label">$obs.label.wh65_batteryStatus</td>
      <td class="data">$get_battery_status($current.wh65_battery.raw)</td>
    </tr>
#end if

should result in the header line but no "Transmitter" data, because 
$have_battery_status being true, but no content, because 
$day.txBatteryStatus.has_data was supposed to be wrong since today. 
However, unfortunately, the complete section disappeared. So, my assumption 
is true only partially: Today there is no more $day.txBatteryStatus, but, 
surprise,  there isn't  $day.wh65_battery either.
What is wrong with it?
 
gjr80 schrieb am Donnerstag, 17. Dezember 2020 um 21:21:10 UTC+1:

> Peter,
>
> Your understanding is correct. The logic in the code now appears correct 
> but I think you are using the incorrect field name. Earlier you posted an 
> archive record:
>
> REC:    2020-12-16 13:30:00 CET (1608121800) altimeter: 
> 30.09246486970751, appTemp: 46.07291271146897, barometer: 
> 30.092169667712717, cloudbase: 944.6426189788297, dateTime: 1608121800, 
> daymaxwind: 3.6, dayRain: 0.0, dewpoint: 45.0455158818643, ET: 
> 0.00012174671890853505, extraTemp1: 124.89439999999999, heatindex: 
> 47.403000000000006, humidex: 48.934644083871206, inDewpoint: 
> 50.88299985988465, inHumidity: 60.0, inTemp: 65.12, interval: 5.0, 
> luminosity: 8184.0, maxSolarRad: 86.02828823732644, monthRain: 
> 0.6653543307086613, outHumidity: 87.0, outTemp: 48.74, pressure: 
> 29.97589031125, radiation: 64.59352801894238, rain: 0.0, rainEvent: 
> 0.4015748031496063, rainRate: 0.0, relbarometer: 1019.2, usUnits: 1, UV: 
> 0.0, uvradiation: 6.5, weekRain: 10.9, wh65_battery: 0.0, windchill: 
> 48.74, windDir: 187.0, windGust: 3.3554127779089566, windGustDir: 187, 
> windrun: 0.22369418519393044, windSpeed: 2.6843302223271652, yearRain: 
> 29.17716535433071
>
> The field name is wh65_battery not wh_65battery. Anywhere you use $day or 
> $current to access the WH65 battery state you need to be using 
> $day.wh65_battery or $current.wh65_battery.
>
> Gary
>
> On Thursday, 17 December 2020 at 22:38:50 UTC+10 Vetti52 wrote:
>
>> Aaah, now I start to understand! The first part is just a definition. Got 
>> it! Thanks!!!!
>>
>> In skin.conf stanza [Labels] [Generic] I found
>>
>>         txBatteryStatus      = Transmitter
>>
>> I replaced the left side with wh65_batteryStatus
>>
>> In Seasons.inc I found:
>>
>> #set $have_battery_status = 0
>> #for $x in [$day.txBatteryStatus, $day.windBatteryStatus, 
>> $day.rainBatteryStatus, $day.outTempBatteryStatus, $day.inTempBatteryStatus]
>>   #if $x.has_data
>>     #set $have_battery_status = 1
>>   #end if
>> #end for
>>
>> and later on:
>>
>> #if $have_battery_status
>>     <tr><th>Batterie Status</th><th></th></tr>
>> #if $day.txBatteryStatus.has_data
>>     <tr>
>>       <td class="label">$obs.label.txBatteryStatus</td>
>>       <td class="data">$get_battery_status($current.txBatteryStatus
>> .raw)</td>
>>     </tr>
>> #end if
>>
>> I replaced all txBatteryStatus entries by wh65_battery  except 
>> $obs.label.wh65_batteryStatus according to the label in skin.conf. 
>>
>> First, all this looks simply logic. However, now the sensors data were no 
>> longer displayed at all. Checked for typos. Nope. So, my logic failed again.
>>
>> I then tried to replace all entries step by step. So, at first, it was 
>> evident, that the expression #for $x in [$day.txBatteryStatus, ...  
>> still results in status = 1, but not, when replaced with 
>> $day.wh_65battery,. 
>>
>> Ok, next step. Then I have to keep the original condition also here:
>>
>> #if $have_battery_status
>>     <tr><th>Batterie Status</th><th></th></tr>
>> #if $day.txBatteryStatus.has_data
>>     <tr>
>>
>> but still use the new values in the next two lines here:
>>
>>       <td class="label">$obs.label.wh65_batteryStatus</td>
>>
>>       <td class="data">$get_battery_status($current.wh65_battery.raw)
>> </td>
>>     </tr>
>> #end if
>>
>>
>> So, finally everything looks fine, same like the results from 
>> interceptor.py. But why do I still need txBatteryStatus? Where does this 
>> value come from? Obviously $current.wh65_battery returns a valid result, 
>> thus providing data. But it is not suitable for evaluating $x. This is 
>> still not logical to me...
>>
>> Actually to me it looks like txBatteryStatus is not the Ecowitt-client 
>> field name, as mentioned in my first post here, but is an internal field 
>> name in Weewx (or why is it regularily used in seasons.inc?). So, it could 
>> have been much less complicated to map wh65_batt to txBatteryStatus. But 
>> I am afraid, that there still was something wrong with it.
>>
>> Peter
>>
>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"weewx-user" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to weewx-user+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/weewx-user/7e243d41-8d37-4aec-bc99-b787fbf145fdn%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to