Ok, this is the missing point. Actually, I hesitate because of this highlight in the Customization Guide: ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- *Warning!* Make a backup of the data before doing any of the next steps! ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
As I am actually not physically close to the Raspi running with Weewx (the actual connection is with ssh from outside), so I prefer the lazy way: I replaced wh65_battery with [[field_map_extension]] txBatteryStatus = wh65_batt and the entry in the stanza [Accumulator] accordingly, wrote back an untouched copy of seasons.inc, uncommented the original label in skins.conf, and voila, after weewx restart, everything looks ok. Although, I would have preferred wh65_battery decribing the field name more precisely, when thinking about adding further sensors in the future. But, at least, I can now understand a little part of the whole thing more than before. Thanks! Peter gjr80 schrieb am Freitag, 18. Dezember 2020 um 10:58:43 UTC+1: > The penny drops. Have you added wh65_battery to your database schema? > $current.wh65_battery will work without wh65_battery being in your schema > but $day.wh65_battery requires wh65_battery be in your schema. > > Refer to Adding a new type to the database > <http://weewx.com/docs/customizing.htm#add_archive_type> in the > Customization Guide. > > Gary > > On Friday, 18 December 2020 at 19:30:22 UTC+10 Vetti52 wrote: > >> Thanks, Gary. The typo was here, not in seasons.inc. But I had another >> assumption: When displaying the values $current.txBatteryStatus.raw and >> $current.wh65_battery.raw , I could see, that the first one was empty, >> and only the second value was existent. My assumption was, that $ >> day.txBatteryStatus had data from time of this day before switching from >> interceptor to gw1000 driver, but $day.wh65_battery did not (yet). >> So I tried this modification: >> >> #set $have_battery_status = 0 >> #for $x in [$day.txBatteryStatus, $day.wh65_battery, >> $day.windBatteryStatus, $day.rainBatteryStatus, $day.outTempBatteryStatus, >> $day.inTempBatteryStatus] >> >> #if $x.has_data >> #set $have_battery_status = 1 >> #end if >> #end for >> >> >> If this was true, I expected, that the sensor section would be present >> today, because >> >> #if $have_battery_status >> <tr><th>Batterie Status</th><th></th></tr> >> #if $day.txBatteryStatus.has_data >> <tr> >> <td class="label">$obs.label.wh65_batteryStatus</td> >> <td class="data">$get_battery_status($current.wh65_battery.raw)</td> >> </tr> >> >> #end if >> >> should result in the header line but no "Transmitter" data, because >> $have_battery_status being true, but no content, because >> $day.txBatteryStatus.has_data was supposed to be wrong since today. >> However, unfortunately, the complete section disappeared. So, my assumption >> is true only partially: Today there is no more $day.txBatteryStatus, >> but, surprise, there isn't $day.wh65_battery either. >> What is wrong with it? >> >> gjr80 schrieb am Donnerstag, 17. Dezember 2020 um 21:21:10 UTC+1: >> >>> Peter, >>> >>> Your understanding is correct. The logic in the code now appears correct >>> but I think you are using the incorrect field name. Earlier you posted an >>> archive record: >>> >>> REC: 2020-12-16 13:30:00 CET (1608121800) altimeter: >>> 30.09246486970751, appTemp: 46.07291271146897, barometer: >>> 30.092169667712717, cloudbase: 944.6426189788297, dateTime: 1608121800, >>> daymaxwind: 3.6, dayRain: 0.0, dewpoint: 45.0455158818643, ET: >>> 0.00012174671890853505, extraTemp1: 124.89439999999999, heatindex: >>> 47.403000000000006, humidex: 48.934644083871206, inDewpoint: >>> 50.88299985988465, inHumidity: 60.0, inTemp: 65.12, interval: 5.0, >>> luminosity: 8184.0, maxSolarRad: 86.02828823732644, monthRain: >>> 0.6653543307086613, outHumidity: 87.0, outTemp: 48.74, pressure: >>> 29.97589031125, radiation: 64.59352801894238, rain: 0.0, rainEvent: >>> 0.4015748031496063, rainRate: 0.0, relbarometer: 1019.2, usUnits: 1, >>> UV: 0.0, uvradiation: 6.5, weekRain: 10.9, wh65_battery: 0.0, >>> windchill: 48.74, windDir: 187.0, windGust: 3.3554127779089566, >>> windGustDir: 187, windrun: 0.22369418519393044, windSpeed: >>> 2.6843302223271652, yearRain: 29.17716535433071 >>> >>> The field name is wh65_battery not wh_65battery. Anywhere you use $day >>> or $current to access the WH65 battery state you need to be using >>> $day.wh65_battery or $current.wh65_battery. >>> >>> Gary >>> >>> On Thursday, 17 December 2020 at 22:38:50 UTC+10 Vetti52 wrote: >>> >>>> Aaah, now I start to understand! The first part is just a definition. >>>> Got it! Thanks!!!! >>>> >>>> In skin.conf stanza [Labels] [Generic] I found >>>> >>>> txBatteryStatus = Transmitter >>>> >>>> I replaced the left side with wh65_batteryStatus >>>> >>>> In Seasons.inc I found: >>>> >>>> #set $have_battery_status = 0 >>>> #for $x in [$day.txBatteryStatus, $day.windBatteryStatus, >>>> $day.rainBatteryStatus, $day.outTempBatteryStatus, >>>> $day.inTempBatteryStatus] >>>> #if $x.has_data >>>> #set $have_battery_status = 1 >>>> #end if >>>> #end for >>>> >>>> and later on: >>>> >>>> #if $have_battery_status >>>> <tr><th>Batterie Status</th><th></th></tr> >>>> #if $day.txBatteryStatus.has_data >>>> <tr> >>>> <td class="label">$obs.label.txBatteryStatus</td> >>>> <td class="data">$get_battery_status($current.txBatteryStatus >>>> .raw)</td> >>>> </tr> >>>> #end if >>>> >>>> I replaced all txBatteryStatus entries by wh65_battery except >>>> $obs.label.wh65_batteryStatus according to the label in skin.conf. >>>> >>>> First, all this looks simply logic. However, now the sensors data were >>>> no longer displayed at all. Checked for typos. Nope. So, my logic failed >>>> again. >>>> >>>> I then tried to replace all entries step by step. So, at first, it was >>>> evident, that the expression #for $x in [$day.txBatteryStatus, ... >>>> still results in status = 1, but not, when replaced with >>>> $day.wh_65battery,. >>>> >>>> Ok, next step. Then I have to keep the original condition also here: >>>> >>>> #if $have_battery_status >>>> <tr><th>Batterie Status</th><th></th></tr> >>>> #if $day.txBatteryStatus.has_data >>>> <tr> >>>> >>>> but still use the new values in the next two lines here: >>>> >>>> <td class="label">$obs.label.wh65_batteryStatus</td> >>>> >>>> <td class="data">$get_battery_status($current.wh65_battery.raw) >>>> </td> >>>> </tr> >>>> #end if >>>> >>>> >>>> So, finally everything looks fine, same like the results from >>>> interceptor.py. But why do I still need txBatteryStatus? Where does >>>> this value come from? Obviously $current.wh65_battery returns a valid >>>> result, thus providing data. But it is not suitable for evaluating $x. >>>> This >>>> is still not logical to me... >>>> >>>> Actually to me it looks like txBatteryStatus is not the Ecowitt-client >>>> field name, as mentioned in my first post here, but is an internal field >>>> name in Weewx (or why is it regularily used in seasons.inc?). So, it could >>>> have been much less complicated to map wh65_batt to txBatteryStatus. >>>> But I am afraid, that there still was something wrong with it. >>>> >>>> Peter >>>> >>>> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "weewx-user" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to weewx-user+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/weewx-user/b6c98c47-3ed9-4f29-86cd-8dc551de0e28n%40googlegroups.com.