On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 13:34:31 -0400,
"Eric S. Raymond" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> After staring at the layout for a while, I think one source of
> grubbiness is that we've used directories to create a sort of
> half-baked package structure without making them package objects.
> The way capaigns are laid out is representative; for a campaign
> named "Battle of Foobar" there will be a Battle_of_Foobar.cfg
> and a Battle_of_Foobar directory, with the directory sort of
> accidentally a package by virtue of {}-inclusions in the .cfg.
I think it makes a lot more sense for campaigns to be under a single
directory. Previously there was no automated process forcing the names
to match up. I remember worrying about this issue in the past when
working with the campaign server.
_______________________________________________
Wesnoth-dev mailing list
Wesnoth-dev@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/wesnoth-dev
