On Sat, May 12, 2007 at 12:23:54 +0200, ott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Bruno Wolff III, > > On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 01:36:21PM -0500, you wrote: > > If references were only allowed within > > a campaign or to main line stuff and not cross campaign, we could make sure > > that removing a campaign will not break another campaign because of > > dependencies. This could enforce the rule that you are supposed to copy > > non main line objects rather than make references to them. > > This seems to contradict the stated aim that campaigns will be > included and excluded using more relaxed criteria. Either mainline is > semi-permanent and can be referenced by campaigns, or it is transient > and should not be referenced by campaigns. Which is it?
I think we are using 'mainline' differently. I meant it to mean config files in data but not in data/campaigns. You might have thought I meant it to be the same as httt. > Personally I think it would make sense to require each campaign to > be completely self-contained. A more complex alternative would be > to designate some content (as opposed to campaigns) as core. I would think the core is anything in data except for data/campaigns. _______________________________________________ Wesnoth-dev mailing list Wesnoth-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/wesnoth-dev
