On Fri, 2009-01-02 at 18:20 +0100, Martin Renold wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 02, 2009 at 05:25:00PM +0100, Mark de Wever wrote:
> > I think such a big move should be agreed by all current core devs and
> > should be considered carefully. Why do you think Wesnoth will attract
> > more developers if it's a Python project?
>
> Speaking only for myself (but as a former contributor), I'd be more excited
> to contribute again if most of the codebase is in Python. I especially expect
> the STL-intense code to be much more fun to work with in Python.
>
> for(std::vector<std::string>::const_iterator i = items.begin();
> i != items.end(); ++i) {
> ...
>
> for item in items:
> ...
Actually in C++ we solved this problem. All you have to do now is,
foreach(const std::string& item, items) {
...
}
>
> The first version is something I really don't want to type in my spare time.
> All my current projects are in Python or mixed Python/C++ these days.
>
> bye,
> Martin / maxy
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wesnoth-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/wesnoth-dev
_______________________________________________
Wesnoth-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/wesnoth-dev
