On Fri, Jan 02, 2009 at 03:17:04PM -0500, Eric S. Raymond wrote: > David White <d...@whitevine.net>: > > Rather, we should take an evolutionary approach to matters. Python > > already exists in Wesnoth, as an AI framework. Developers who think that > > Python would advantage Wesnoth should simply begin implementing > > additional components in Python. > > I agree.
I also agree. > I think Ivan's code is a good candidate for merge exactly > because it leaves most of the existing C++ in place, *not* forcing a > big bang on us. Can you then tell me what Ivan's code then exactly does? Boucman and I have asked Ivan but we didn't get a real answer. So I don't know what it replaces, but from what I gathered it was replacing a big part of the Wesnoth. Also I would like to know what the status of the code is, Ivan told it was experimental but I've no idea how experimental. -- Regards, Mark de Wever aka Mordante/SkeletonCrew _______________________________________________ Wesnoth-dev mailing list Wesnoth-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/wesnoth-dev
