On Sat, Jan 3, 2009 at 5:30 PM, allefant <allef...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 5:25 PM, Mark de Wever <ko...@xs4all.nl> wrote: >> The Python bindings we currently use are ref counted, so if somebody >> fails there the garbage collection will fail and you still have a memory >> leak. >> > > This could be solved by using different bindings, like Boost::Python > (or SWIG or pyrex or ...). > > Ivan, is there some specific reason you use the low-level Python-C-API for > this?
All tools I would like to have as references are written this way: pygame, pycairo and CPython implementation itself. Also I had not very good experience with SWIG in the past. Ivan _______________________________________________ Wesnoth-dev mailing list Wesnoth-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/wesnoth-dev
