> (In general, if nobody else is around, I'm always willing to do whatever needs to be done even if I'm technically in Wesbreak.)
Okay, good to know. > I personally don't think the situation on this end is that bad compared to the release process. I wasn't going to go there :p > Adding new developers with push access is not even terribly time-critical with the (proper) Git workflow, unless I'm missing something. Well, it's a little different right now because there is apparently a lack of devs at this moment who have push access and the time / energy to review these small patches, (and in some cases, also having the expertise in whatever area the patch is relevant to.) In such a situation, once we've reviewed half of the someone's patches at least and they seem to know what they are doing, it seems much better to try to give them push-access right away to keep them engaged. It surely gets quite old having to lobby in the irc channel for someone to merge a bunch of patches, when the channel has been relatively quiet lately. Best Regards, Chris Beck On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 1:54 AM, Ignacio R. Morelle <shadowm2...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Monday 22 September 2014 00:12:06 chris beck wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I'm writing to the list because I've been trying for about a month to > find > > someone who is able to add new devs to the project. > > You contacted me about this on the 12th, so at least on my end it hasn't > been > a whole month. (You also only mentioned one name.) > > Since AI does indeed appear to be MIA, I can handle this task for now, > provided confirmation from the pull request reviewer(s) that the > candidate's > work meets our code and commit quality standards, but I won't be able to > review the actual code myself. > > (In general, if nobody else is around, I'm always willing to do whatever > needs > to be done even if I'm technically in Wesbreak.) > > > [...] the limited number of people on this "owners" list seems to be > > becoming a bottleneck, I merely want to suggest that we add some more > > people, for expedience. > > I personally don't think the situation on this end is that bad compared to > the > release process. Adding new developers with push access is not even > terribly > time-critical with the (proper) Git workflow, unless I'm missing something. > > -- > Regards > Ignacio R. Morelle <shadowm> > > _______________________________________________ > Wesnoth-dev mailing list > Wesnoth-dev@gna.org > https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/wesnoth-dev >
_______________________________________________ Wesnoth-dev mailing list Wesnoth-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/wesnoth-dev
