Can you monitor 2000 services with WUG? -----Original Message----- From: James Amann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 28, 2002 3:19 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [WhatsUp Forum] Monitoring NT Services
All, I have a problem to add here. i am attempting to monitor services on a Win2k server from a Winnt server running WUG 6.02. Right now I am able to monitor services on a Winnt server, but when i attempt to enumerate the services on the Win2k Srv, it fails. The account user/pass is the same on both boxes with admin rights all around. I checked the security settings in local security policy as discussed below by matt and my LAN Manager Authentication Level is: "Send LM & NTLM responses" Any assistance would be appreciated. >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 01/28/02 08:02AM >>> I had issues monitoring NT from Win2k server... Problem was the authentication method, which is set in the local security policy. 2k supports stronger authentication than NT, so you have to allow LM and NTLM in your Lan Man authentication settings. -----Original Message----- From: BRATHWAITE, ANDREW [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 25, 2002 10:52 AM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: [WhatsUp Forum] Monitoring NT Services Well Folks, I am finally able to monitor NT Services. I originally had WhatsUP Gold installed on a Win2K Pro box, but I removed it and placed it on an NT Box. This newly installed configuration appears to be working as advertised. When I get a chance I will look into the problem that I was having with the Win2K Pro Box and let you know where the problem occurred. For now I will just continue testing WUG. Thanks to everyone who provided assistance in this regard. You were all quite responsive. That is another plus in favor of WUG-this forum is ok. Hope this helps, Andrew Brathwaite Information Systems Department Office: (718) 636-1000 x412 Beeper: (917) 356-7487 E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -----Original Message----- From: Matt Wasserman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 25, 2002 8:10 AM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: [WhatsUp Forum] Monitoring NT Services Set up local admin accounts on all the boxes with identical user names and passwords. Then run WUG using the local admin account. -----Original Message----- From: Shmuel Weitzner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 10:50 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [WhatsUp Forum] Monitoring NT Services Is there a way to designate domain\userid when accessing a different domain without trust? "Mark Symons" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@list.ipswitch.com Thursday January 24, 2002 03:10 PM Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cc: Subject: RE: [WhatsUp Forum] Monitoring NT Services ...and remember to use your WhatsUp Gold Debug log when testing monitoring of NT Services - it will tell you exactly where the problem is. Mark Symons Ipswitch, Inc Augusta GA -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tim Farley Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 14:11 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [WhatsUp Forum] Monitoring NT Services > Just to be clear, does the account WUG is running under have admin > rights on the remote machine, or just locally? It must have administrative rights to the REMOTE machine. > Is the username and password the same on both? That's one way to achieve it, particularly if you are not running in a Windows domain, or the target host is in a different domain than you are. You have WUG run under an account name and password that happens to match an administrator-equivalent account name and password at the target. > Is the remote machine in a domain? Is the WUG machine in a domain? Either can be or not. If both are in the same domain, the whole thing is easier because you can run WUG under any account that is in the "Domain Admins" group. By default, any machine in a domain allows users in the Domain Admin group to also administrate that machine. If both are not, or one is and one isn't, then you probably are going to have to use the "same username, same password" trick. Hope that helps. --Tim Farley IPSWITCH Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html to be removed from this list. An Archive of this list is available at: http://www.mail-archive.com/whatsup_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html to be removed from this list. An Archive of this list is available at: http://www.mail-archive.com/whatsup_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html to be removed from this list. An Archive of this list is available at: http://www.mail-archive.com/whatsup_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html to be removed from this list. An Archive of this list is available at: http://www.mail-archive.com/whatsup_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html to be removed from this list. An Archive of this list is available at: http://www.mail-archive.com/whatsup_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html to be removed from this list. An Archive of this list is available at: http://www.mail-archive.com/whatsup_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html to be removed from this list. An Archive of this list is available at: http://www.mail-archive.com/whatsup_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html to be removed from this list. An Archive of this list is available at: http://www.mail-archive.com/whatsup_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
