Þann fim 14.júl 2011 09:38, skrifaði Oli Studholme:
in graphic design a footer contains supplementary information about
the content it follows. the spec initially disallowed ‘fat footers’,
but the naming and common usage would have led to people using them
for fat footers regardless of the spec. they still contain
supplementary information about their sectioning element or sectioning
root. This semantic connection seems stronger to me than one based on
arbitrary size
Would it not be less confusing to forbid 'fat footers' and rename footer
-> credit?
