Simon Pieters <sim...@opera.com>, 2014-02-05 16:04 +0100: > On Wed, 05 Feb 2014 15:11:32 +0100, David Carlisle <dav...@nag.co.uk> wrote: > >On 05/02/2014 13:24, Simon Pieters wrote: > >>Is there a situation in which it is conforming to use html:title > >>outside the <head> in a document where the root is html:html? In > >>math:annotation-xml? > ... > >but unlike the svg case MathML doesn't have any special requirements > >here, and I don't think it would cause problems if any convenient (for > >you) behaviour was defined, or this was declared invalid (and for > >example the valid content of annotation-xml encoding="text/html" was the > >same as that of html <body>) > > Yeah, I think that the content model for annotation-xml with > encoding="text/html" or encoding="application/xhtml+xml" should be flow > content.
Yeah. I went ahead and raised an HTML spec bug: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=24526 (I'll update the validator if/when the spec makes a change.) --Mike -- Michael[tm] Smith http://people.w3.org/mike