I'd like us to include the src jars. It should be just an option with
maven, and I always hate it when I have to do it myself (like with
most projects unfortunately).
Eelco
On 1/23/07, Erik van Oosten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Igor,
Actually, I do use maven. I just have lots of bad experiences with it.
Including it screwing up my eclipse config files. I don't like it when I
have to read a whole book for something simple as building (well,
perhaps it is not so simple anymore :( ).
> > - do we need to supply all dependencies in the source and/or binary
> > distribution
> You could make it optional. Spring does this and at times I have found
> this very convenient.
Just an option. If is too much effort, the wicket core will suffer. So
in that case, I could not care less :)
Building the src jars is another matter. Not everybody can/will do so.
Regards,
Erik.
Igor Vaynberg wrote:
> fine. you dont use maven, but we do. why should we spend extra time
> packaging things in a zip, blah, blah when they are easily available
> to you
> from the maven repo?
>
>
http://wicketstuff.org/maven/repository/org/apache/wicket/wicket/1.3-incubating-SNAPSHOT/
>
>
> http://mirrors.ibiblio.org/pub/mirrors/maven2/wicket/wicket/1.2.4/
>
> rather then downloading a zip that has everything, just download the
> parts
> that you need
>
> -igor
>
--
Erik van Oosten
http://day-to-day-stuff.blogspot.com/
