This surprises me too. I would have sworn we supported that, and it strikes me as a very useful feature.
Eelco On 3/26/07, Matej Knopp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Well, I do agree with you on this one. I wonder if there was other reason for why it is like it is right now. IIRC there was something with markup parsing but i'm not sure. -Matej On 3/26/07, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 3/26/07, Matej Knopp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > IIRC the behavior used to be like that. But then someone decided that > > it is too fragile if you put your component into a repeater... > > But that is the choice of the user, not the framework. Now you make it > completely impossible to write stable javascript quickly, and you have > to resort to filtering your page with markup id's... Creating a lot of > extra work, just for a case that is completely manageable and > explainable. > > Martijn > > -- > Learn Wicket at ApacheCon Europe: http://apachecon.com > Join the wicket community at irc.freenode.net: ##wicket > Wicket 1.2.5 will keep your server alive. Download Wicket now! > http://wicketframework.org >