Was it 2.0 only? Eelco
On 3/26/07, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This surprises me too. I would have sworn we supported that, and it strikes me as a very useful feature. Eelco On 3/26/07, Matej Knopp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Well, I do agree with you on this one. I wonder if there was other > reason for why it is like it is right now. IIRC there was something > with markup parsing but i'm not sure. > > -Matej > > On 3/26/07, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 3/26/07, Matej Knopp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > IIRC the behavior used to be like that. But then someone decided that > > > it is too fragile if you put your component into a repeater... > > > > But that is the choice of the user, not the framework. Now you make it > > completely impossible to write stable javascript quickly, and you have > > to resort to filtering your page with markup id's... Creating a lot of > > extra work, just for a case that is completely manageable and > > explainable. > > > > Martijn > > > > -- > > Learn Wicket at ApacheCon Europe: http://apachecon.com > > Join the wicket community at irc.freenode.net: ##wicket > > Wicket 1.2.5 will keep your server alive. Download Wicket now! > > http://wicketframework.org > > >
