Johan Compagner wrote: > > ahh and that is the change why getModel() needs to be final now... > because here and there we are directly looking at the model field instead > of > calling getModel() > so if you would override getModel() all that code would fail (or always > see > a null value) > > johan >
Sorry, I don't get that. If you don't call getModel(), how can an overwritten version break your code ? It would if you were calling getModel(), but that's just what it no longer does ! Jan. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Timeframe-to-move-wicket---wicket-ext-projects-to-JDK1.5-tf3638110.html#a10197572 Sent from the Wicket - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
