On Tue, 19 Jun 2007, Igor Vaynberg wrote: > dont know if we need a separate wicket-ioc which wont be very useful by > itself, we could just move that stuff into extensions.
I think that it would be very useful by itself (as a possible proxified version of @Configurable of Spring) and even without wicket. So I vote for org.apache.wicket.injection and org.apache.wicket.proxy to move to wicket-independent igor-ioc :) It's such an elegant solution. And I'd like to be able to use it e.g. in Eclipse RCP which has enough classloader complexity already without AspectJ (on which @Configurable relies on). - Timo -- Timo Rantalaiho Reaktor Innovations Oy <URL: http://www.ri.fi/ >
