Timo Rantalaiho wrote:
On Tue, 19 Jun 2007, Igor Vaynberg wrote:
dont know if we need a separate wicket-ioc which wont be very useful by
itself, we could just move that stuff into extensions.
I think that it would be very useful by itself (as a possible
proxified version of @Configurable of Spring) and even without
wicket.
Hmm, well at the moment, it depends on org.apache.wicket.Component, and
requires IComponentInstantiationListener and things as well, so it's not
really that standalone.
I still think requiring extensions seems churlish, though, so wicket-ioc
it shall be.
Regards,
Al
--
Alastair Maw
Wicket-biased blog at http://herebebeasties.com
