As Jesse referenced, once we move to Java 1.5 we can still release Java 1.4 versions via tools such as Retroweaver... assuming that the tool works as advertised. Has anyone had more experience in these types of tools? - Jason B. Jesse Sightler wrote: I'm completely in favor of jumping to Wicket 2.0 and implementing both of these changes with it. Java 5 support would be a really big plus (esp. with tools like Retrotranslator and Retroweaver) for me as well.I'm sure that won't be perfect for some people, but I think it is reasonable to cut over now and keep a 1.2 version as a maintenance branch. -- Jess On 2/13/06, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:All, We are of course very busy finalizing Wicket 1.2, and we /really/ hope to get it done soon. This will benefit everyone. So I want to take a look beyond 1.2 and try to get some opinions on our roadmap, and adjust where appropiate. There are two very big things ahead of us: - constructor refactor we have reached a limit to the support we want to provide for Ajax and _javascript_. In order to provide the best support we need to know the markup id before it is available. Many have been bitten by trying to retrieve an attribute from a component tag in the page constructor. We want to remedie this by removing the add() method, and replacing it with an extra parameter in the component constructor, which sets the parent of the component. public MyPage() { WebMarkupContainer c = new WebMarkupContainer("foo"); c.add(new TextField("bar1")); c.add(new Label("bar2")); c.add(new Label("bar3")); add(c); } will become: public MyPage() { WebMarkupContainer c = new WebMarkupContainer(this, "foo"); new TextField(c, "bar1"); new Label(c, "bar2"); new Label(c, "bar3"); } This opens up a lot of better markup parsing strategies for the core. We know this is a major API break, but we feel it is necessary to implement it in order to move Wicket forward. - java 5 support This is something a lot of people are waiting for. I understand that many people want, Igor states /need/, Java 5 support in Wicket. There is also a negative side to this. Some, or even many of you, can't move to java 1.5 as a server platform. We don't know how many users this affects. Please give a response when you can't move to 1.5. As Wicket is a volunteer effort, we can only support so many projects. Supporting both a 1.4 and 1.5 project will drain our resources too far, and won't be possible. So we have to make a choice. The questions I'm seeking answers to are the following: - should the post 1.2 version of Wicket involve both changes? - should we make different releases for either change, and thus postponing 1.5 to Wicket 3? - how many of you still require for current or future projects to run on JDK 1.4? - how many would object to having a retroweaver build of a JDK 5 Wicket, which enables you to run 1.5 code on a 1.4 JRE? Thanks for your answers, Martijn -- Living a wicket life... Martijn Dashorst - http://www.jroller.com/page/dashorst Wicket 1.1.1 is out: http://wicket.sourceforge.net/wicket-1.1 ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmdlnk&kid3432&bid#0486&dat1642 _______________________________________________ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=k&kid3432&bid#0486&dat1642 _______________________________________________ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user |
- Re: [Wicket-user] Post 1.2 roadmap JasonB
- Re: [Wicket-user] Post 1.2 roadmap Erik van Oosten
- Re: [Wicket-user] Post 1.2 roadmap Jesse Sightler
- Re: [Wicket-user] Post 1.2 roadmap Mark Derricutt
- Re: [Wicket-user] Post 1.2 roadmap Jesse Sightler
- Re: [Wicket-user] Post 1.2 roadmap Erik van Oosten
- Re: [Wicket-user] Post 1.2 roadmap Jesse Sightler
- Re: [Wicket-user] Post 1.2 roadmap Eelco Hillenius
- Re: [Wicket-user] Post 1.2 roadmap Jesse Sightler
- Re: [Wicket-user] Post 1.2 roadmap wang lei
- Re: [Wicket-user] Post 1.2 roadmap Philip A. Chapman