Igor Vaynberg wrote:
allow myself to quote...myself

|| imho, html is the best layout manager out there for browser apps. add css to the mix and you have a great skin manager as well.

i never said css was great for layout manager :) and yes the box model is broken.
The box model really is broken. Therefore I always stick with IE box model

                        * {
                                box-sizing: border-box;
                                -moz-box-sizing: border-box;    
                        }

The only thing to take care of is not to allow IE6 to work in standard-compliance mode. So far, I had no problems with this setup. I'm doing quite complicated layouts using just css (no tables) and everything works fine. I just hope that IE7 won't screw everything up.

-Matej


-Igor


On 5/17/06, *Johan Compagner* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:

    ha! and css is easier then layout manager in java...
    hmm that is not how i see it.
    CSS is just plain horrible stupid box thing..

    And what is a layout manager in css? There isn't one everything is
    sort of absoluut positioned and then you can do in swing also
    (not recommended ofcourse)

    johan


    On 5/17/06, *Igor Vaynberg* < [EMAIL PROTECTED]
    <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:

        imho, html is the best layout manager out there for browser
        apps. add css to the mix and you have a great skin manager as well.

        the one thing you always hear swing developers bitching about is
        how they have to fight the layout managers to get the results
        they want. gridbaglayout is poweful but its a huge pain to work
        with.

        matisse+grouplayout are the holy grail for swing devels, its
        nice and easy to create layouts. but it still requires a gui to
        do this, while i can do html easily by hand. also browser screen
        space doesnt translate easily to the desktop space. in desktop
        space you are pixel aware, you are also pixel aware of your
        fonts and the south east corner of the window. in html you have
        none of these things.

        look at wingS framework examples, they use layout managers. look
        how rectangular their examples look.

        -Igor




        On 5/17/06, *Frank Silbermann * <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
        <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:

            I, personally, don't care for HTML, and perhaps I might enjoy
            programming in Echo2 better.

            But suppose an employer maintained an HTML fragment with
            links to their
            entire portfolio of web applications, and wanted this
            fragment to appear
            on every page of each web application.  Since someone else is
            maintaining that scrap and keeping it up-to-date, I would
            not want to
            translate it into Echo 2 and maintain my own copy.

            Would it not likely be easier to incorporate such an HTML
            scrap into a
            Wicket application, versus one written in a framework such
            as Echo 2
            that abstracted away the HTML completely?


            -----Original Message-----
            From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
            <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
            [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
            <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>] On Behalf
            Of Eelco
            Hillenius
            Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2006 10:58 AM
            To: wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
            <mailto:wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net>
            Subject: Re: [Wicket-user] Google Web Toolkit integration ?

            >  It's certainly an intriguing idea (have a look at haxe.org
            <http://haxe.org> if you find
            >  it interesting), ...
            ...
            Yeah. I see some advantages of using layout managers -
            basically the
            same promise as Swing has - but currently I would still
            prefer using
            HTML for layout. If I would like the GWT way of developing
            applications, I would have choosen Echo 2 a long time ago.
            GWT looks
            like a next gen Echo to me, though with a very big name
            behind it, and
            some cool innovations. ... Eelco



            -------------------------------------------------------
            Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web
            services, security?
            Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to
            make your job easier
            Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on
            Apache Geronimo
            http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmdlnk&kid0709&bid&3057&dat1642
            
<http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmdlnk&kid%120709&bid&3057&dat%121642>
            _______________________________________________
            Wicket-user mailing list
            Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
            <mailto:Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net>
            https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user







-------------------------------------------------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Reply via email to