Alexandru Popescu schrieb: > On 6/8/06, Timo Stamm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> John Patterson schrieb: >>> Currently, I am considering either apache url rewriting to remove all >>> session ids from non-conversational pages or hacking wicket to disable >>> url encoding for all pages that do not absolutely require a session. >> Are you sure this issue is that important? In my experience, Google does >> index pages with a session id parameter in the URL. The session id is >> stripped in the search result URL, so I don't see any problems. Even if >> there is any penalty, it is probably much more important to have good >> content. > > Unfortunately this is not completely accurate information.
I was writing about my experience and I wrote it down accurately. > Google > indeed indexes pages with jsessionid in their URLs, but it is not > stripping it. The session id is stripped from the link in the search result page. At least in the cases I had to deal with. That means that the user doesn't get a message like "session expired". > Due to this, same page (retrieved through same URL, but > containing different jsessionid-s) will have their page ranks computed > independently. Yes. Timo _______________________________________________ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
