We've gathered a lot of opinions by now (more are still welcome though!) and I think we should let this sink in for a bit.
There are a couple of projects being built on 2.0 (see the replies in this thread, but also http://www.mail-archive.com/general@lists.ops4j.org/msg00240.html), but so far, people who reacted seem to be understanding and flexible to go with us if we would decide to revert the constructor change. It looks like quite a few people, more than I expected in fact, weren't that crazy about the constructor refactor in the first place, though some people like it better in general (me being one of them though I see disadvantages as well, but also http://www.mail-archive.com/general@lists.ops4j.org/msg00402.html). Based on the replies in this thread, it seems that people find add more intuitive and like the flexibility that gives you over the tighter model of 2.0 I propose to start a real vote on what to do with the constructor change somewhere next week. Until then, please feel free to keep venting your opinions on this thread. Regards, Eelco ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
