> I found a comment by Jonathan Locke claiming that Wicket is 17.4% > faster than tapestry. > >From my local tests on simple 'hello world' applications on tomcat, > I got results showing that tapestry 4.0 is approximately 60% faster > than wicket 1.2.5. > > Where can I get details of those benchmarks? > Maybe I missed option like 'wicket-speed = 2x'? ;-)
https://wicket-stuff.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/wicket-stuff/branches/wicket-1.x/wicket-benchmark > I'm quite new to wicket and I like the concept. > However I'm going to build an application that serves many clients at > once, so I think performance matters. Imo, you should take any of these benchmarks with a big grain of salt. It all depends on your setup etc. More importantly, regarless of how interesting these tests might look, the web framework (unless you're using RoR or something) will *not* be the determining factor in your performance and scalability (and please note that scalability has not much to do with performance per se). Your database layer is much more likely to be what breaks down when your system will start receiving big load. > Is it possible to create > a large scalable application with wicket? Sure. That's what we're using it for. Best thing to do is test yourself. And I'd recommend you to use something more useful than HelloWorld. Eelco ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
