> I am sad to announce that my company did not choose to use wicket after
> comparison with struts 2. :-(
>
> One criticism that came out as we were looking at Wicket code was that
> there seems to be a need to write a lot of Java code in a ListView for
> such things as displaying a table. Although I did not see this issue as
> out-weighing all the benefits, many of my colleagues did.
All I'll say is that I'm personally sure this is not about technology - this
has to be politics, and these colleagues must have already learnt Struts2
and want to protect their investment or have the misconception that Struts2
== Struts1. Or maybe they were swayed by some presentation that used job
search statistics to compare web ui frameworks...
Sometimes it is a waste of time to try and convince people. Been there done
that. Just move on.
Regards,
Peter.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
