I got ninja'd yesterday when I reviewed the code. :-)
As for the "needs positive return on dismantle" condition, I don't have a strong opinion, but I'd prefer to not have it, even though in most circumstances dismantling without return would be useless. My reasons: 1) The condition - even though it makes sense - doesn't really add anything. The game would work fine without it. And regular buildings (and most special builidings in campaigns) have proper return on dismantle amounts anyway, so I wouldn't expect "false" bug reports about this. 2) Not having the condition allows for a little more flavour in missions. Like in emp04. Or maybe there'll be a mission where destroying would come with a fire hazard to neighboring buildings, possibly destroying them, too. (Not sure this is possibly atm, i.e., whether we can detect the difference between dismantling and destroying via mission scripts. Just a general idea.) 3) If the building is not far from a warehouse with a builder available, dismantling without return is even a little faster than destroying. Difference is minor though. -- https://code.launchpad.net/~widelands-dev/widelands/empire04_unused_key_return_on_dismantle/+merge/358273 Your team Widelands Developers is subscribed to branch lp:~widelands-dev/widelands/empire04_unused_key_return_on_dismantle. _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~widelands-dev Post to : widelands-dev@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~widelands-dev More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
