I think the first part of your claim needs to be substantiated first! Almost all of the content on the English Wikipedia, for example, is of low quality.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Version_1.0_Editorial_Team/Index On 8/29/07, Desilets, Alain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I need a good solid reference to substantiate the following claim: > > "Besides leading to high quality content, wikis have been shown to be good > tools for fostering the emergence of active communities" > > Does anyone know of a good research paper that looks specifically at this > kind of impact of wikis? > > Thx. > > > ---- > Alain Désilets, National Research Council of Canada > Chair, WikiSym 2007 > > 2007 International Symposium on Wikis > Wikis at Work in the World: > Open, Organic, Participatory Media for the 21st Century > > http://www.wikisym.org/ws2007/ > > > _______________________________________________ > Wiki-research-l mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l >
_______________________________________________ Wiki-research-l mailing list [email protected] http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
