Hello, Stuart.

Thank you for your feedback. A few comments on what you wrote --

* With the exception of username & email (which are mandatory), all the
other personal details are not, so it is up to participants to decide on
their level of interaction and involvement. Some people are happy to share
the information requested, some less so.

* Every single piece of data collected is related to a research
question(s).  As an example, one part of the questionnaire focuses on
community and how it influences learning. For this part specifically, we
wanted to check (among other things) for a correlation between online
activity on WD and participation in various social media platforms, such as
the WD Facebook group and the telegram group, so a cross between the
username and real name is needed. That does not suit everyone, and that's
fine, but it's a question we'd like to answer and are therefore collecting
this information from those willing to provide it.

* Not sure which "similar surveys" you are comparing this research to, but
there was never any similar research about Wikidata. Even the ones I know
of about Wikipedia, also do not research for exactly what I'm researching.
That said, many research papers I've read that deal with learners, try to
infer from personal data such as age, occupation, gender etc. This is not
uncommon and the terms of confidentiality were expressed clearly.

* When you write, "the overview suggests that further pages are going to
ask for more personal information", that is absolutely right.
Every single question in this questionnaire is asking participants about
their *personal experience* engaging with Wikidata as a learning platform,
making it personal information. I'm unsure why you find that problematic.
That is what questionnaires do. They ask participants about their
experience with X.

Finally, our community never had any similar research done on Wikidata,
especially not in relation to Education, and I have naturally asked for the
community's support.
This research cannot happen without the community. It reply on it heavily,
unlike other (and very popular) "big data" approaches.
There are various way in which the community demonstrated its support --
some chose to fill out the questionnaire; some even agreed to participate
in a follow up interview; some would not fill it out themselves, but have
shared it with their local communities; some simply sent some good words
and 'good luck' my way; and some sent me (welcome) feedback on things to
improve.  They did so (and continue to do so) because they know it's an
important topic, and I'd like to believe that it's also because they know
me and trust me. They know that being part of the community, I will do
whatever I can to use the information they shared with me for the good and
for creating positive impact in Academia (which I have done for years with
Wikipedia and now with Wikidata).

While I do not expect anyone to show support blindly, I do find your
message a bit puzzling -- weather you meant it or not, your mail suggests
that your are unsupportive of this research and your tone was dismissive,
without portraying the situation accurately, nor by checking the details
properly.
That is your prerogative, as is not filling out the questionnaire. But I
would urge you to reconsider.
Take a closer look. Assume good faith. And you'll find that once you pass
the personal info part, the questions are not at all intrusive, but rather
focused, genuine, inquisitive and most importantly -- focused on the
Wikidata experience you've had.

In short, I hope you reconsider. If you don't, that's fine as well.

Shani.

-----------------------------------------------
*Shani Evenstein Sigalov*
EdTech Innovation Strategist, NY/American Medical Program, Sackler School
of Medicine, Tel Aviv University.
PhD Candidate, School of Education, Tel Aviv University.
Lecturer, Tel Aviv University.
Chairperson, WikiProject Medicine Foundation
<https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wiki_Project_Med>.
Chairperson, Wikipedia & Education User Group
<https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_%26_Education_User_Group>.
Chairperson, The Hebrew Literature Digitization Society
<http://www.israelgives.org/amuta/580428621>.
Chief Editor, Project Ben-Yehuda <http://bybe.benyehuda.org>.
*+972-525640648*


On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 11:52 PM Stuart A. Yeates <syea...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I find the personal information requested particularly intrusive
> compared to other similar surveys (and the overview suggests that
> further pages are going to ask for more personal information),
> especially since the cover page does not mention any ethics board
> approval (not sure if this is required in Israel).
>
> Do you really have a plan for evaluating the responses that requires
> all this information? If not, why are you collecting it?
>
> As it stand I'll not be answering this survey.
>
> cheers
> stuart
>
> --
> ...let us be heard from red core to black sky
>
> On Tue, 18 Dec 2018 at 10:14, Shani Evenstein <shani.e...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Thanks, Leila!
> > Not sure why this happened with the link, but happy you found one that
> > works.  :)
> >
> > Shani.
> >
> > -----------------------------------------------
> > *Shani Evenstein Sigalov*
> > EdTech Innovation Strategist, NY/American Medical Program, Sackler School
> > of Medicine, Tel Aviv University.
> > PhD Candidate, School of Education, Tel Aviv University.
> > Lecturer, Tel Aviv University.
> > Chairperson, WikiProject Medicine Foundation
> > <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wiki_Project_Med>.
> > Chairperson, Wikipedia & Education User Group
> > <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_%26_Education_User_Group>.
> > Chairperson, The Hebrew Literature Digitization Society
> > <http://www.israelgives.org/amuta/580428621>.
> > Chief Editor, Project Ben-Yehuda <http://bybe.benyehuda.org>.
> > *+972-525640648*
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 11:00 PM Leila Zia <le...@wikimedia.org> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Shani and all,
> > >
> > > On Sun, Dec 16, 2018 at 5:27 AM Shani Evenstein <shani.e...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Dear Wiki-researchers,
> > > >
> > > > I have a huge favor to ask of everyone in this mailing list --
> > > >
> > > > TLDR: *please fill out* *this questionnaire
> > > > <
> > >
> https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/%E2%80%8Bhttps://goo.gl/forms/WMFb6j2mpG2HwFTx2
> !
> > > !>!*
> > >
> > > There is something about the above link that doesn't work. I /think/
> > > you meant to share:
> > >
> > >
> https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSc_h3LPcPgM2V3W5tNdRdWjw3ayRUq73nD0HyhVz07SKwE0Hw/viewform
> > >
> > > Good luck with your research! :)
> > >
> > > Best,
> > > Leila
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Wiki-research-l mailing list
> > > Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Wiki-research-l mailing list
> > Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wiki-research-l mailing list
> Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
>
_______________________________________________
Wiki-research-l mailing list
Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l

Reply via email to