https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=61729
--- Comment #15 from Erik Moeller <e...@wikimedia.org> --- I think everyone agrees that the communication about the single-page test wasn't sufficient. But I don't think the LQT comparison is valid. LQT comes with a rather scary per-page flag allowing any page to be LQT-enabled, and the discussions you're pointing to refer to enabling LQT across Meta. Flow has no such flag right now - pages are manually and carefully selected for testing purposes, and effects truly are pretty limited. This deploy enabled a page called "Developer test page". So this analogy seems _very_ stretched, and the arguments seem theoretical at this point. What practical concerns are there with the current test page deploy? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
