https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=61729
--- Comment #16 from MZMcBride <b...@mzmcbride.com> --- (In reply to Erik Moeller from comment #15) > What practical concerns are there with the current test page deploy? I think you and I may fundamentally disagree about whether pissing off a local editing community and engendering further ill will toward these type of projects (ArticleFeedbackv5, LiquidThreads, Flow, UniversalLanguageSelector, VisualEditor, etc.) is a practical concern. The erosion of trust and collaboration between the Wikimedia Foundation and the active editing communities is a very serious and practical concern, in my opinion. As far as I know, deploying Flow will not cause anything to explode. This is _not_ the same as saying deploying Flow will not cause any harm. I think attempting to force this alpha discussion software on Meta-Wiki (and wherever else next) will actively harm already battered relations. I'll try to put it another way: if the software has virtue and merit as a product, it should be no issue for the Flow team to establish local community consensus to test it out. However there are over 800 Wikimedia wikis; if, after discussion and consultation, the Meta-Wiki community decides it doesn't want to install Flow right now, test it elsewhere. What's the issue? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
