Tarrow added a comment.
We opened T231731 <https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T231731> as a means to count future tainted-refs triggering and some related data. What I'm not clear on about all the above discussion is exactly what data we're trying to collect. It seems to me that the baseline we should be aiming for should try to focus only on events that we're interested in changing (i.e. edits to statements via the ui) Specifically whether we want to include only places where the tainted-references feature would have been triggered or not. If we only want to see places where the feature would have been triggered (e.g by a UI change) that a necessary (but not sufficient) criteria for this would be selecting only those that use `wbsetclaim` since the UI edits always use these. > If moving forward we want this to be more real time then all of the data we need in mediawiki_history is also in the SQL tables for mediawiki for wikidata and the same data can be retrieved from there. We might get some or all of this data in the future from live stats collection (which will help us separate out UI and non-UI edits) TASK DETAIL https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T240466 EMAIL PREFERENCES https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/ To: GoranSMilovanovic, Tarrow Cc: Aklapper, Addshore, Jan_Dittrich, hoo, rosalieper, noarave, Tarrow, Lydia_Pintscher, GoranSMilovanovic, WMDE-leszek, Sarai-WMDE, darthmon_wmde, Nandana, Lahi, Gq86, QZanden, LawExplorer, _jensen, Scott_WUaS, Wikidata-bugs, aude, Mbch331
_______________________________________________ Wikidata-bugs mailing list Wikidata-bugs@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-bugs
